Grinding coffee bean-by-bean is up there with cryogenic grinding, double grinding and re-processing as a kind of impractical perfection — all of which are generally dismissed as inappropriate for the commercial environment. Wet grinding isn’t a thing — it was just a dream of the early third wavers — but let’s throw that in there too. Cryogenic grinding is a thing, but in this post we’re gonna explain how it was that we found a real world practical use for bean-by-bean grinding.

To date, the best investigation into bean-by-bean grinding was carried out by astrophysicist-cum-barista Prof Jonathan Gagne. A few years back, some of his subscribers were concerned about how the widespread uptake of single-dose grinding (where you throw a pre weighed dose of beans into an empty grinder hopper) would change the way coffee grinders perform, compared to when the beans are fed into the التروس via a full hopper. Jonathan managed to show that the difference was real but possibly negligible; i.e. just a couple of beans at the end would experience the so-called popcorn effect and grind a little more coarsely. 

There are two terms you need to know before you read any further. 

Gagne’s experiment did a good job at quieting concerns that single doses could create inferior grind profiles, compared to full hoppers. He speculated that it’s probably only the last couple beans that experience the popcorn effect and the particle size analyses he ran comparing the two grind profiles from his Niche grinder were virtually identical. But, in his blog post he also made this observation: 

‘Grinding bean-by-bean generates a slightly tighter [grind size] distribution, therefore mimicking a higher quality grinder.’ 

Soon after Gagne’s post, The Hoff also had a go at it, combining double-grinding and an ultra slow feed into his grinder, and said afterwards 

‘I was able to produce what I think was a sweeter, tastier, more delicious espresso.’

Since then, bean-by-bean grinding has sat there as a tempting frontier with quite a lot of unexplored potential. And then, all of a sudden we needed bean-by-bean grinding — not just to please the coffee gods, but for actual practical reasons. 

The Experiments

As you know, we’ve been writing about the new generation of filter baskets recently. One thing all the new high extraction baskets have in common is that they require you to grind quite a lot finer. And sometimes, if you happen to use an oily dark roast — or you haven’t cleaned your التروس for a while, you might discover that your grinder gets completely choked up, with the beans unable to exit the grinder at all. It happens all the time with really dark roasts. For this reason, makers of commercial grinders — especially ones like the Mazzer ZM which have a digital grind adjustment mechanism — sometimes create a minimum إعداد الطحن to prevent grinders getting choked and also to prevent التروس from grinding against each other.

Well, our grinder choked up while we were testing our new Sworks Billet basket. With that particular coffee, we found bean-by-bean grinding was a handy way of guaranteeing beans at any roast level would always feed into the التروس properly. Plus, in theory, bean-by-bean appeals to us because each individual bean can have the same experience as it enters and leaves the التروس — it never has to wait in the queue. The thing is though, the bean-by-bean approach pushed the required إعداد الطحن a LOT finer. Not just a LOT finer … so much finer that we had to change from Mazzer’s k151I to the k151B 83-mm burr set, which has just about the smallest outfall depth you can find. 

Three 83-mm burr sets with increasingly large tertiary cuts. From left to right, the k151B (espresso burr); the k151I (hybrid burr); the k151F (filter burr)

We asked Lloyd Meadows at Tortoise Espresso to have a crack at bean-by-bean on his EK43 grinder, paired with his new Pesado HE% baskets. Lloyd soon found himself on the absolute finest setting his EK would allow and his وقت تحضير الجرعات were gushing through in eight seconds. So we’d now maxed out the fine-grind potential of two of the industry’s leading single-dose grinders, but we weren’t going to quit. (Please note: Lloyd doesn’t use the Turkish التروس — we’re expecting they would be suitable for bean-by-bean grinding for espresso)

Next step was to override the ZM’s safety features (don’t try this at home). After recalibrating the ZM grinder to grind finer than would usually be possible, we were dialled in for bean-by-bean grinding on a setting roughly twice as fine as the single-dose setting. And the bean-by-bean shots were averaging a full percentage point higher than the full hopper. (If you’re not familiar with measuring coffee extractions, a 1% increase is a lot). We went from an average of 22.3% up to 23.3%. It’s hard to slow down high extraction baskets much past 16-20 seconds, but those bean-by-bean shots that took around 31–41 seconds were absolute godshots.

You look at our data set and you can see how much higher and tighter the extraction yield percentage is from bean-by-bean. So, a couple of thoughts here: whilst bean-by-bean may be slow and impractical, it makes unbelievably tasty espresso. It also makes your grinder way quieter, even though the motor is on for longer. We can speculate that it will significantly reduce heat build up in the التروس (that’s a test for another day) and we know it alleviates issues of grinders getting choked, even with evil dark roasts. The automated fix for this could be as simple as redesigning the auger that brings the beans into the التروس to slow down the feed or putting another auger in the hopper as well. As things stand, this approach may require the beans to go marching one-by-one, but for sure this is a fast track if you wanna ‘get-down to the grounds.’